On September 13, 2016, Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Education Cathy Koshland wrote a problematic response to the DOJ’s findings and conclusions (PDF) that the university was in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act in how it managed its online course offerings (MOOCs) as well streamed lecture content.
Many Berkeley faculty members were very concerned with the tone and content of VC Koshland’s response and wrote the attached open letter in response (full text also provided at end of this post):
We welcome additional signatories to the letter. Please e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org if you wish to sign in support. Please include your full name and university title.
Update (2016.09.22 15:54): The FCDR has signed on as a signatory to the faculty letter.
Text of letter follows.
September 22, 2016
Dear Vice Chancellor Koshland:
As faculty at the University of California Berkeley, we are concerned about and disappointed with both the tone and content of your published response to the Department of Justice’s Findings and Conclusions as to how the university’s online course offerings violate the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. It is hurtful and harmful to suggest in any way that people with disabilities are responsible for a decision that might limit online courses and other presentations. This kind of scare tactic creates hostility toward accommodating and therefore including people with disabilities. While we assume that you did not intend to blow a dog whistle that incites disability access backlash, we fear that this has been the result, which not only harms our students and the public who have disabilities but also the University’s national and international reputation.
We suggest that U.C. Berkeley take the recently announced approach of Ford Foundation President Darren Walker, who wrote a public letter acknowledging the omission of disability in developing his foundation’s agenda. Rather than becoming defensive, Mr. Walker admitted that in “the 18 months that we meticulously crafted FordForward—an extensive, exhaustive process—we did not meaningfully consider people with disabilities in our broader conversations about inequality.” After apologizing for this omission, Mr. Walker went on, “… So how do we do this? How do we move from unwitting ignorance to enlightened action?” This is the approach we would have expected of our University. How do we do better?
UC Berkeley has a long and proud history as a global leader in disability rights, education, and research. As a result, we have a tremendous wealth of knowledge and resources on how to make education accessible. We have ourselves come up with policies that mandate access across the university. As far as we can ascertain, you did not tap any of the faculty or staff with expertise in the area of education and online access (we are thinking, for instance, of the knowledge that Lucy Greco in the ATTLC would have brought to the table), before issuing a press release which threatens limiting public access because of the purported costs of disability access. It is worth noting that “public,” in this instance, excludes millions of people with disabilities, including our own students with disabilities who use these resources. Moreover, your statement presents disability accommodations as the cause of a zero sum game. We know that making courses accessible means that all students and learners benefit, disabled or not.
The DOJ letter is an opportunity for us to acknowledge that we can do better. We must comply with the law, but rather than being defensive and operating from a place of fear, we can be constructive and work towards our mission of public education.
We call on the administration to break out of its insularity and consult the deep well of knowledge and expertise that is already on this campus. We ask for an immediate meeting of administrators, faculty, staff, and students with knowledge and expertise in this area to work on constructive solutions to the problems that the DOJ letter has so clearly spelled out.
Robert and Colleen Haas Distinguished Chair in Disability Studies and Professor of Anthropology
Professor of English
John and Elizabeth Boalt Lecturer in Law
Lecturer in English
Lecturer in Public Health
Lecturer in Disability Studies
Lecturer in Law
Additional UC Berkeley signatories following the publishing of the open letter
Associate Professor of Gender & Women’s Studies and Vice Chair for Research; Director, Center for the Study of Sexual Culture
Professor of Art Practice and Disability Studies
Associate Professor of Environmental Policy and Societal Change
UCB Organizations signing in support of this letter
Faculty Coalition for Disability Rights
Berkeley Disabled Students
Updated 9/22/16 3:40 PM
 I.e., your language that “[we] must strongly consider the unenviable option of whether to remove content from public access,” has already been quoted in media, see Forbes article titled “Department of Justice Wages War on Free Education” (2016.09.21).